Using argumentation theory to identify the challenges of shared decision-making when the doctor and the patient have a difference of opinion

Main Article Content

Claudia A. Zanini
Sara Rubinelli | sara.rubinelli@paranet.ch

Abstract

This paper aims to identify the challenges in the implementation of shared decision-making (SDM) when the doctor and the patient have a difference of opinion. It analyses the preconditions of the resolution of this difference of opinion by using an analytical and normative framework known in the field of argumentation theory as the ideal model of critical discussion. This analysis highlights the communication skills and attitudes that both doctors and patients must apply in a dispute resolution-oriented communication. Questions arise over the methods of empowerment of doctors and patients in these skills and attitudes as the preconditions of SDM. Overall, the paper highlights aspects in which research is needed to design appropriate programmes of training, education and support in order to equip doctors and patients with the means to successfully engage in shared decision-making.

Downloads month by month

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Zanini, C., & Rubinelli, S. (2012). Using argumentation theory to identify the challenges of shared decision-making when the doctor and the patient have a difference of opinion. Journal of Public Health Research, 1(2), e26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2012.e26