The importance of public health in radiology and radiation protection

Abstract

The ionizing radiation belongs to the basic physical factors that can be measured. We forget often about its risks and the possible damage to our health. The imaging methods which use the ionizing radiation increase the diagnostics quality and they have become a certainty for many medical workers. Therefore, they are being used without rational thinking many times. With this is related to increasing the cumulative dose of patients. Next problem can be radiation safety knowledge of medical workers. The enormous increase in the use of sources ionizing radiation in medicine and rapid development, there may be a disproportionate acquisition of radiation safety knowledge of healthcare workers. At the same time, constant attention must be paid to the biological effects of radiation and realize epidemiology studies. In all the areas mentioned the public health has space. However, it is sad that presently, the radiation safety is not considered important enough in Public Health.  Based on many sources, it is safe to say that this is a major problem, because the public health itself can play an important role in radiation safety. It is important to point out, that safety and effectivity of using the source of ionizing radiation is one of the main components of Good Medical Practice.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

WHO. Public health services. Accessed: January 28, 2021. Available from: https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/Health-systems/public-health-services

Pongpirul K, Lungren MP. Public Health and International Epidemiology for Radiology. Radiology in Global Health. Springer, New York: 2014.

Loose, RW, Vano E, Mildenberger P, et al. Radiation dose management systems- requirements and recommendations for users from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative. Eur Radiol 2021;31:2106-14.

Guglielmi G, Pinto A, Salerno S. Editorial from guest editors current Euratom legislation (DE 59/2013): new patient management in radiation protection. Radiol Med 2019;124:711–3.

Vanhavere F, Carinou E, Gualdrini G et al. ORAMED: Optimization of radiation protection of medical staff. EURADOS Report 2012-02.

Torresin A, Evans S, Lizio D, et al. Practical recommendations for the application of DE 59/2013. . Radiol Med 2019;124:721–7.

Faggioni L, Paolicchi F, Bastiani L, et al. Awareness of radiation protection and dose levels of imaging procedures among medical students, radiography students, and radiology residents at an academic hospital: Results of a comprehensive survey. Euro J Radiol 2017;86:135-42.

Cabanekov H. [Ionizing radiation and health risk].[in Sovak]. XI. Banskoštiavnickdni: Bansk Štiavnica, 2009. Accessed: January 28, 2021. Available from: https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/41/122/41122251.pdf

Domenech H. Radiation Safety. Management and Programs. Cham: Springer: 2017.

Podzimek F. 2015. [Radiological physics (Physics of ionizing radiation)].[Book in Czech]. Praha: ČVUT: 2015.

Franco A, Ciccarelli M, Sorriento D, et al. Rays sting: The acute cellular effects of ionizing radiation exposure. Transl Med 2016;14:42-53.

Paolicchi F, Miniati F, Bastiani L, et al. Assessment of radiation protection awareness and knowledge about radiological examination doses among Italian radiographers. Insights Imaging 2016;7:233-42.

WHO. Global initiative on radiation safety in healthcare settings. 2008. Accessed: January 28, 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/about/GI_TM_Report_2008_Dec.pdf

Ivanov VK, Kasjcheev VV, Chekin SY, et al. Estimation of risk from medical radiation exposure based on effective and organ dose: How much difference is there? Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2013;155:317-28.

Ivanov VK, Tsyb AF, Mettler FA, et al. Methodology for estimating cancer risk of diagnostic medical exposure: with an example of the risks associated with computed tomography. Health Phys 2012;103:732-9.

OECD. Health at a Glance 2017. Paris: OECD, 2017.

Štubňa M. [Radiation risks potentially associated with CT].[in Czech]. Česk Budějovice: University of South Boehmia; 2013.

Carpeggiani C, Kraft G, Caramella D, et al. Radioprotection (un)awareness in cardiologists, and how to improve it. J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28:1369-74.

Malone J, Guleria R, Craven C, et al. Justification of diagnostic medical exposures, some practical issues. Report of an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Consultation. Br J Radiol 2012;85:523-38.

Gerić M, Popić J, Gajski G, et al. Cytogenetic status of interventional radiology unit workers occupationally exposed to low-dose ionising radiation: A pilot study. Mutat Res 2019;843:46-51.

Coppeta L, Pietroiusti A, Neri A, et al. Risk of radiation-induced lens opacities among surgeons and interventional medical staff. Radiol Phys Technol 2018;12:26-9.

Ko S, Kang S, Ha M, et al. Health effects from occupational radiation exposure among fluoroscopy-guided interventional medical workers: A systematic review. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018;29:353-66.

Picano E, Vano E, Domenici L, et al. Cancer and non-cancer brain and eye effects of chronic low-dose ionizing radiation exposure. BMC Cancer 2012;12:157.

Reeves RR, Ang L, Bahadorani J, et al. Invasive cardiologists are exposed to greater left sided cranial radiation: The BRAIN Study (Brain radiation exposure and attenuation during invasive cardiology procedures). JACC Cardiovascr Interv 2015;8:1197-206.

Burns S, Thornton R, Dauer LT, et al. Leaded eyeglasses substantially reduce radiation exposure of the surgeon’s eyes during acquisition of typical fluoroscopic views of the hip and pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:1307-11.

König AM, Etzel R, Thomas RP, et al. Personal radiation protection and corresponding dosimetry in interventional radiology: An overview and future developments. Rofo 2019;191:512-21.

Meisingeer QC, Stahl CM, Andre MP, et al. Radiation protection for the fluoroscopy operator and staff. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016;207:745-54.

Behzadmehr R, Doostkami M, Sarchahi Z, et al. Radiation protection among health care workers: knowledge, attitude, practice, and clinical recommendations: a systematic review. Rev Environ Health 2021;36:223-34.

Marwe B. Standardised training and assessment in radiation safety for diagnostic radiographers. PhD Thesis. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of The Free State Bloemfontein; 2014.

European Commission. Radiation Protection 116. Guidelines on education and training in radiation protection for medical exposures. European Commission; 2000. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/116.pdf

International Atomic Energy Agency, World Health Organization. Bonn call for action. 10 principles of strengthening radiation protection in healthcare for the next decade. IAEA, WHO, 2012. Accessed: January 28, 2021. Available from: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/17/12/bonn-call-for-action.pdf

O’Sullivan J, O’Connor J, O’Regan K, et al. An assessment of medical students’ awareness of radiation exposures associated with diagnostic imaging investigations. Insights Imaging 2010;1:86-92.

Ng SE, Sa, F. Assessment of awareness and practice of ionizing radiation protection procedures among exposed health care workers. Egypt J Occup Med 2020;44:529-44.

Alavi SS, Dabbagh ST, Abbasi M, et al. Medical radiation workers’ knowledge, attitude, and practice to protect themselves against ionizing radiation in Tehran Province, Iran. J Educ Health Promot 2017;6:58.

Alzubaidi MA, Mutairi HH, Alakel SM, et al. Assessment of knowledge and attitude of nurses towards ionizing radiation during radiography in Jeddah city. Egypt J Hospital Med 2017;69:2906-9.

Söylemez H, Sancaktutar AA, Silay MS, et al. Knowledge and attitude of European urology residents about ionizing radiation. Urology 2013;81:30-6.

Shabani F, Hasanzadeh H, Emadi A, et al. Radiation protection knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) in interventional radiology. Oman Med J 2018;33:141.

Ihle IR, Neibling E, Albrecht K, et al. Investigation of radiation‐protection knowledge, attitudes, and practices of North Queensland dentists. J Investig Clin Dentistry 2019;10:e12374.

Ramanathas S, Ryan J. Radiation awareness among radiology residents, technologists, fellows, and staff: where do we stand? Insights Imaging 2014;6:133-39.

Hagi SK, Khafaji MA. Medical student’s knowledge of ionizing radiation and radiation protection. Saudi Med J 2011;32:179-83.

Campanella F, Rossi L, Giroletti E, et al. Are physicians aware enough of patient radiation protection? Results from a survey among physicians of Pavia District - Italy. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17:406.

Enabulele JE, Igbinedion BO. An assessment of dental students’ knowledge of radiation protection and practice. J Educ Ethics Dentistry 2014;3:54-5.

Kim TH, Hong SW, Woo NS, et al. The radiation safety education and the pain physicians’ efforts to reduce radiation exposure. Korean J Pain 2017;30:104-15.

Foley SJ, Evanoff MG, Rainford LA. A questionnaire survey reviewing radiologists’ and clinical specialist radiographers’ knowledge of CT exposure parameters. Insights Imaging 2013;4:637-46.

Published
2021-03-12
Info
Issue
Section
Reviews
Supporting Agencies
This work was supported by Grant of University of Trnava number 11/TU/2020
Keywords:
education, ionizing radiation, public health, radiation safety, radiology
Statistics
  • Abstract views: 1107

  • PDF: 422
  • HTML: 0
How to Cite
Bárdyová, Z., Horváthová, M., Pinčáková, K., & Budošová, D. (2021). The importance of public health in radiology and radiation protection. Journal of Public Health Research, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2021.2141